http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5497
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-07 05:54 ------- My interpretation of the comments in bug 5257 is that people were reporting problems with a threshold of 0.1 because of too many low scoring spam being incorrectly learned so the ham threshold was lowered to -1.0. The comment there about it getting 1.21% of the ham was not to say that such a small percentage is desirable, it meant that in our mass check corpus a threshold of -1.0 did find 1.21% and that is enough for Bayes to function. It sounds like at your site a -1.0 threshold gets much less than 1.21% of the ham and it isn't enough for bayes to function. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
