http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5777
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 00:07 ------- (In reply to comment #17) > DNSBL technology handles it fine - anything else is about preferences. > > valid for you, yes, others may differ It's got nothing to do with SURBL vs URIBL. It's about the number of free host subdomains that can be abused. If you want to ignore the underlying principles and logic, that's fine. > cleaning up AFTER abuse doesn't stop spammers from abusing - geocities is the > best example. Cleaning up after the abuse is not the only use for the data. Hosts/mail operators/DNS registrars also use it to find patterns and pre-emptively nuke whole classes of abusers. Sometimes the operators need to put the systems in place to do the autonuking. But they need the abuse feedback as input to those systems. Given that you seem unwilling to even consider these issues in an open-minded spirit, I see no reason to continue discussion. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
