https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5752
--- Comment #12 from Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-15 11:43:50 PST --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > Should there be a warning if the user attempts to use SA with no rules > > installed? I presume so. > > Hrm. I want to say yes, but at the same time I know there are uses of SA to > process messages and not scan them, so configs aren't necessarily needed. An > argument, of course, would be to at least then always pass in something like > "config_text => ''" -- if you don't need configs, make sure you don't have > any. > > How about a warning/error from "spamassassin" and "spamd", but not the > modules? works for me. note however that we already have something that partially does this -- if you don't have a "Check" plugin registered, lint or check will produce a fatal error. so when using the modules directly you have to add a "miniature" config to load the Check plugin. So adding this to the modules might actually *increase* the usability a little anyway! people who are using the modules directly (Mark M, David) -- what do you guys think? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
