https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5752
--- Comment #22 from Phil Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-06 02:46:05 PST --- (In reply to comment #21) > (recording a discussion from the mailinglist from back in May 2008:) > > In environments requiring strict change control or that are otherwise > paranoid in terms of security, (direct) online updates are usually not > desired (or not possible, because eg the firewall concept forbids > mailservers from doing HTTP requests). Do these establishments also veto the timely application of antivirus pattern updates? Or security updates on core infrastructure servers? A core rule update for spamassassin is akin to an antivirus detection patterns update. I'm sorry, but I don't think we should be pandering to the cluelessness of bureaucrats here. If they were truly paranoid about security they'd be getting SA updates on as fast as possible, automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
