https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5752
--- Comment #20 from Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-04-16 15:38:12 PST --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #10) > > (In reply to comment #9) > > > Should there be a warning if the user attempts to use SA with no rules > > > installed? I presume so. > > > > Hrm. I want to say yes, but at the same time I know there are uses of SA to > > process messages and not scan them, so configs aren't necessarily needed. > > An > > argument, of course, would be to at least then always pass in something like > > "config_text => ''" -- if you don't need configs, make sure you don't have > > any. > > > > How about a warning/error from "spamassassin" and "spamd", but not the > > modules? > > works for me. this is now implemented. : jm 126...; svn commit -m "bug 5752: add a warning telling the user to run 'sa-update' in Mail::SpamAssassin, if no rules are found in the system config dir, which will be possible since we plan to no longer distribute rules in the basic tarball" Sending lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm Sending lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm Sending lib/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm Sending spamassassin.raw Sending spamd/spamd.raw Transmitting file data ..... Committed revision 648888. next step is to fix the "make dist"/"make tardist"/"make disttest" situations. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
