On 10/19/2009 02:31 AM, Henrik K wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 01:57:38AM -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
Replying to a private post in public because the results are important.
On 10/16/2009 10:22 AM, Anonymous wrote:
http://www.lashback.com/support/UnsubscribeBlacklistSupport.aspx
It seems to hit a lot, but I don't have a good feel for how reliable it
is.
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091017-r826198-n/T_RCVD_IN_UBL/detail
Tested the Lashback UBL in the Saturday masscheck. 7.9% of spam and
2.3% ham! This blacklist in its current form is dangerous and should
not be used.
Posting to dev..
Could you (and others) please announce if you are going to add any new net
rules?
Especially since that list seems to have a public rsync feed, I would
_really_ like to use it and not add unnecessary traffic to my lousy cable or
the list.
I intended to test it in only a single Saturday masscheck. Furthermore
it is set to tflags nopublish so it will not be auto-promoted. It seems
that you aren't doing nightly masschecks.
Where is the problem here?
Warren Togami
[email protected]
