On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 18:23 +0200, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> unless I've misunderstood Henrik, what he wants to mildly point out that
> the SA masscheck might not be the ideal place to test the rbl_du_jour.
+1
> iirc, the "normal" process has been:
>
> - run local BL on mirror
> - run private masschecks
> - check for other user's rating/results on as many public sites as possible
> - discuss on BL's own lists/forums
ACK. New BLs for inclusion usually have either been run locally and
found to be useful (just like most contributed rules), or officially
asked to be included (bugzilla).
Warren, since you don't even intend to include these BLs in stock SA, as
you mentioned in a follow-up...
Please do not use the mass-check contributors for your or the BL's
personal statistics, without even asking the contributors. They are a
precious resource.
The mass-checks are there to evaluate SA rule's performance. They are
not free for personal interest. If you want some stats for yourself,
please run it on your systems. Don't expect everyone else to do it for
you.
guenther
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
