On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:34:17AM -0400, Warren Togami wrote: > On 10/19/2009 10:26 AM, Henrik Krohns wrote: >>>> >>>> Posting to dev.. >>>> >>>> Could you (and others) please announce if you are going to add any new net >>>> rules? >>>> >>>> Especially since that list seems to have a public rsync feed, I would >>>> _really_ like to use it and not add unnecessary traffic to my lousy cable >>>> or >>>> the list. >>>> >>> >>> I intended to test it in only a single Saturday masscheck. Furthermore >>> it is set to tflags nopublish so it will not be auto-promoted. It seems >>> that you aren't doing nightly masschecks. >>> >>> Where is the problem here? >> >> I'll try to be polite after a long work day. The problem is your >> understanding. And yes, I haven't done masschecks in a moment, but I will. >> It has nothing to do with the matter. >> > > It is unhelpful to say, "The problem is your understanding." without > explaining the issue. I am trying to be helpful and to understand your > concern, but so far you are making no sense.
"I intended to test it in only a single Saturday masscheck." How is that an excuse? It's still an active rule that other people will be running, not just me. Perhaps you want to test different lists every saturday, which very well may be the case looking at your current activities. If you do not know what rsync+rbldnsd can do, here is a hint: It enables foolproof lookups for the list, not generating network traffic or failing from network congestion. I just asked that new net rules would be mentioned so everyone knows. I'm surprised I have explain this more, when the reason was clearly in my original post.
