On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:01:19PM -0400, Warren Togami wrote: > On 10/19/2009 11:33 AM, Henrik Krohns wrote: >> >> "I intended to test it in only a single Saturday masscheck." >> >> How is that an excuse? It's still an active rule that other people will be >> running, not just me. Perhaps you want to test different lists every >> saturday, which very well may be the case looking at your current >> activities. >> >> If you do not know what rsync+rbldnsd can do, here is a hint: It enables >> foolproof lookups for the list, not generating network traffic or failing >> from network congestion. >> >> I just asked that new net rules would be mentioned so everyone knows. I'm >> surprised I have explain this more, when the reason was clearly in my >> original >> post. >> > > I don't have control over the other nightly masscheck hosts for them to > use their own rsync+rbldnsd.
So? They use it if they want. I like to use it. > Sure, I can warn the list about new net rules. Thank you. I would imagine it's good practise to announce new BL tests _in any case_. > But I don't understand how this is helpful or how this is an issue. Pointless to continue this then.
