https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6417
--- Comment #9 from Michael Scheidell <[email protected]> 2010-07-06 09:12:08 EDT --- Still get FP's iv experimented with !SPF_PASS, and I think you should rethink: #1, NO rule should be > 2.5 points. NO RILE #2, if DNS is missing, and, or, as I have seen in the field, MS does not publish SPF records for all of their technical lists, I think we should reverse that test. instead of !_SPF_PASS && HK_FAKENAME_MICROSOFT I Propose: HK_FAKENAME_MICROSOFT && (SPF_SOFTFAIL | SPF_FAIL) This takes care of bad, pore, slow, missing dns records, as well as legit MS lists that publish SPF records. instead of limiting this rule to only MS groups that publish SPF, this will only trigger on forgeries of lists that DO publish SPF. (and please, set score to 2.5!) -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
