https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6417
--- Comment #12 from John Wilcock <[email protected]> 2010-07-06 10:58:31 EDT --- Michael, would adding the original helo subrule (or an improved helo check if necessary) back into the meta eliminate your FPs? meta HK_FAKENAME_MICROSOFT __HK_NAME_MICROSOFT && !__HK_HELO_MICROSOFT && !SPF_FAIL For that matter, we could also add && !DKIM_VALID if there are any cases of genuine microsoft senders which use DKIM but not SPF. If none of this is enough to alleviate the FPs, maybe the rule should be dropped altogether. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
