https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6417
--- Comment #11 from Michael Scheidell <[email protected]> 2010-07-06 10:43:51 EDT --- other option is this: meta HK_CREDIT_FAKENAME (HK_FAKENAME_MICROSOFT && (SPF_PASS || DKIM_VALID)) tflags HK_CREDIT_FAKENAME nice net score HK_CREDIT_FAKENAME -3.5 since SA 3.30's stated rescoring mantra is 'less FP's because FP's cost more', I believe this above meets those goals. (or credit for whatever the fakename score is) is this safer? still, MS has lots of lists with no SPF and no DKIM. lots of technical lists in fact. we sell through VARS who are also MS VARS and this does catch lots of FP's -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
