https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6417
--- Comment #10 from John Wilcock <[email protected]> 2010-07-06 10:38:05 EDT --- I haven't seen any FPs since the change, though we get very little genuine mail from Microsoft. However, Michael's proposed && (SPF_SOFTFAIL | SPF_FAIL) would miss much of the spam that I suspect this rule was originally designed to hit. Spam with subjects such as the following, purportedly from domains owned by Microsoft but with no published SPF: From: "Microsoft Corporation Inc"<[email protected]> From: Microsoft Corporation <[email protected]> Then again, on the basis of my small corpus the rule could be dropped entirely as the spam samples I have would have scored highly even without it. But my mail feed is very low volume and fairly heavily filtered at SMTP time. Grepping quickly through the SMTP-time rejects I see plenty of envelope senders that are clear Microsoft fakes, so I suspect that I'm only seeing a very small portion of the spam that the rule was designed to hit. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
