Just cleaned up worst offenders in 50_scores.cf that have low S/O in ruleqa.
Other pending examples in sandbox like 0 0 0.0010 0.000 0.46 1.00 UC_GIBBERISH_OBFU 0 0.0008 0.0060 0.119 0.45 1.00 HEXHASH_WORD IMO rules should not even be allowed a score over 0.001 with such low hitrates, something is very wrong. On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 11:55:35AM +0300, Henrik K wrote: > > Something else I just noticed.. > > How can a rule that's been performing like this for atleast the past few > weeks, > > MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME WHO/AGE > 0 3.3833 25.8343 0.116 0.37 0.00 STYLE_GIBBERISH > > ... result in score of 1.111 with network checks on?? > > 72_scores.cf:score STYLE_GIBBERISH 0.001 1.111 0.001 > 1.111 > > Doesn't seem like the scoring logic is working properly.. > > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 04:15:08PM +0000, Paul Stead wrote: > > Historically this was done periodically - it's not been done for a long > > time. > > > > I've been working on the QA system - it's definitely feasible to get all of > > the rules going past the QA eyes and a score assigned automatically. > > > > I'd like to iron out a few of the kinks and bugs within QA before pursuing > > this - it's currently overly complex and too many edge cases and exceptions > > to count - though I'm squishing the big ones in place as I see them. > > Currently a bad sandbox rule can break the daily releases which in turn > > could end up with an empty ruleset if things landed correctly. > > > > I think it should be thought about and if right to do implemented with a > > concise re-look at the QA scripts, their purpose and chronological ordering > > - some rules can take up to 2 weeks to be QAd and released, others take > > 24-48 hours, depending. I'd like this to be more predictable and reliable. > > > > Paul > > > > ???On 13/06/2019, 16:58, "Henrik K" <h...@hege.li> wrote: > > > > Continuing on list. > > > > I've been wondering about this, 50_scores.cf is never updated > > automatically. > > When is that supposed to be done? > > > > Should we move all rules inside sandbox so things actually start scoring > > automatically? Lol. > > > > > > > > -- > > Paul Stead > > Senior Engineer > > Zen Internet > > Direct: 01706 902018 > > Web: zen.co.uk > > > > Winner of 'Services Company of the Year' at the UK IT Industry Awards > > > > This message is private and confidential. If you have received this message > > in error, please notify us and remove it from your system. > > > > Zen Internet Limited may monitor email traffic data to manage billing, to > > handle customer enquiries and for the prevention and detection of fraud. We > > may also monitor the content of emails sent to and/or from Zen Internet > > Limited for the purposes of security, staff training and to monitor quality > > of service. > > > > Zen Internet Limited is registered in England and Wales, Sandbrook Park, > > Sandbrook Way, Rochdale, OL11 1RY Company No. 03101568 VAT Reg No. 686 0495 > > 01
