https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7981
--- Comment #16 from Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgr...@apache.org> --- (In reply to Sidney Markowitz from comment #15) > (In reply to Henrik Krohns from comment #11) > > Maybe time for pre2 soon? > > I'm seeing agreement for a pre2, but I would like clarification about where > we are with bug #7987 which is listed as an open blocker for 4.0, and bug > #7992 which is open with a 4.0 milestone, both with significant work already > committed to trunk. > > How much of what is remaining on those two is what Michael Storz is > referring to in comment #13 ? > > I think that a necessary condition for a pre-release is that there not be > any open issues targeted for 4.0 other than this bookkeeping one. It doesn't > matter what combination of closing issues vs moving unfinished tasks to > future we do. The Bugs 7987 and 7992 are not important to me for a 4.0 release. They could always be kicked to 4.0.1. At $dayjob, we've been running things from trunk after pre1 because of all the DMARC issues we've been working on / uncovering. We need more people to test things and a pre2 would help with that is the goal from my POV. A Pre and an RC are pretty different and I think you are applying RC status not POV status. Before RC, we should go into R-T-C mode, etc. but I love the momentum and all the patches / discussion flying around. Anything to keep that momentum up is good even though I'm still behind by weeks on reading all the SVN/BZ notes! Good problems to have. -KAM -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
