https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #17 from Henrik Krohns <apa...@hege.li> --- (In reply to Sidney Markowitz from comment #16) > Created attachment 5966 [details] > proposed patch with meta rules disabled too and more comments > > I'm attaching a patch instead of committing this because I don't usually > touch anything that goes right into the rule updates. > > Could someone check this and commit it if it looks good? > > This adds a score 0 for the meta rule and updates the comment to more > accurately reflect the status of dnwl.org, state the problem with false > negatives that can occur if the admin enables the rules without proper > configuration, and instructions on how to enable it. Not sure if you can even score subrules. Isn't this whole thing made too complex? If something is not supposed to be in default ruleset and active, shouldn't it just be completely removed? No one is going to read 50_scores.cf comments anyway for instructions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
