https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #22 from Sidney Markowitz <sid...@sidney.com> --- (In reply to Benny Pedersen from comment #21) According to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/DnsBlocklists it will work to either set score 0 of every rule that is defined to call eval:check_rbl on the dnsbl you want to disable, or use dns_query_restriction deny for that domain. Since I'm trying to come up with what we can do in rule updates to disable default use of dnswl.org I was talking about the choice of setting the rule scores to 0. But now I'm looking at the third alternative, removing the rule definitions completely. Without __RCVD_IN_DNSWL being defined there is no reason to set its score to 0 or to configure dns_query_restriction deny dnswl.org. I agree that if I was configuring my local files to disable some dnsbl I might use dns_query_restriction instead. By the way, I can't find any mention of dwl.dnswl.org in the default rules or configuration. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.