Hi Dongjoon,
Thanks for the hint! I updated the SPIP accordingly.
I also changed the access permissions for the SPIP and design sketch
docs so that anyone can comment.
Best,
Martin
On 29.01.19 18:59, Dongjoon Hyun wrote:
Hi, Xiangrui Meng.
+1 for the proposal.
However, please update the following section for this vote. As we see,
it seems to be inaccurate because today is Jan. 29th. (Almost February).
(Since I cannot comment on the SPIP, I replied here.)
Q7. How long will it take?
*
If accepted by the community by the end of December 2018, we
predict to be feature complete by mid-end March, allowing for QA
during April 2019, making the SPIP part of the next major Spark
release (3.0, ETA May, 2019).
Bests,
Dongjoon.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:52 AM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com
<mailto:gatorsm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
+1
Jules Damji <dmat...@comcast.net <mailto:dmat...@comcast.net>>
于2019年1月29日周二 上午8:14写道：
+1 (non-binding)
(Heard their proposed tech-talk at Spark + A.I summit in
London. Well attended & well received.)
—
Sent from my iPhone
Pardon the dumb thumb typos :)
On Jan 29, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com
<mailto:denny.g....@gmail.com>> wrote:
+1
yay - let's do it!
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:28 AM Xiangrui Meng
<men...@gmail.com <mailto:men...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25994>. It
introduces a new DataFrame-based component to Spark,
which supports property graph construction, Cypher
queries, and graph algorithms. The proposal
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ljqVsAh2wxTZS8XqwDQgRT6i_mania3ffYSYpEgLx9k/edit>
was made available on user@
<https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/269cbffb04a0fbfe2ec298c3e95f01c05b47b5a72838004d27b74169@%3Cuser.spark.apache.org%3E>
and dev@
<https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c4c9c9d31caa4a9be3dd99444e597b43f7cd2823e456be9f108e8193@%3Cdev.spark.apache.org%3E>
to
collect input. You can also find a sketch design doc
attached to SPARK-26028
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26028>.
The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply
with your vote:
+1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP.
+0: Don't really care.
-1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the
following technical reasons.
Best,
Xiangrui
