+1 for the proposal
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:46 PM Mingjie Tang <tangr...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1, this is a very very important feature. > > Mingjie > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:42 AM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Change my vote from +1 to ++1 >> >> Xiangrui Meng <men...@gmail.com> 于2019年1月30日周三 上午6:20写道： >> >>> Correction: +0 vote doesn't mean "Don't really care". Thanks Ryan for >>> the offline reminder! Below is the Apache official interpretation >>> <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#expressing-votes-1-0-1-and-fractions> >>> of fraction values: >>> >>> The in-between values are indicative of how strongly the voting >>> individual feels. Here are some examples of fractional votes and ways in >>> which they might be intended and interpreted: >>> +0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with this.' >>> -0: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't do this.' >>> -0.5: 'I don't like this idea, but I can't find any rational >>> justification for my feelings.' >>> ++1: 'Wow! I like this! Let's do it!' >>> -0.9: 'I really don't like this, but I'm not going to stand in the way >>> if everyone else wants to go ahead with it.' >>> +0.9: 'This is a cool idea and i like it, but I don't have time/the >>> skills necessary to help out.' >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:31 AM Martin Junghanns >>> <martin.jungha...@neotechnology.com.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Dongjoon, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the hint! I updated the SPIP accordingly. >>>> >>>> I also changed the access permissions for the SPIP and design sketch >>>> docs so that anyone can comment. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Martin >>>> On 29.01.19 18:59, Dongjoon Hyun wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, Xiangrui Meng. >>>> >>>> +1 for the proposal. >>>> >>>> However, please update the following section for this vote. As we see, >>>> it seems to be inaccurate because today is Jan. 29th. (Almost February). >>>> (Since I cannot comment on the SPIP, I replied here.) >>>> >>>> Q7. How long will it take? >>>> >>>> - >>>> >>>> If accepted by the community by the end of December 2018, we >>>> predict to be feature complete by mid-end March, allowing for QA during >>>> April 2019, making the SPIP part of the next major Spark release (3.0, >>>> ETA >>>> May, 2019). >>>> >>>> Bests, >>>> Dongjoon. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:52 AM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Jules Damji <dmat...@comcast.net> 于2019年1月29日周二 上午8:14写道： >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>> (Heard their proposed tech-talk at Spark + A.I summit in London. Well >>>>>> attended & well received.) >>>>>> >>>>>> — >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>> Pardon the dumb thumb typos :) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 29, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> yay - let's do it! >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:28 AM Xiangrui Meng <men...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994 >>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25994>. It introduces >>>>>>> a new DataFrame-based component to Spark, which supports property graph >>>>>>> construction, Cypher queries, and graph algorithms. The proposal >>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ljqVsAh2wxTZS8XqwDQgRT6i_mania3ffYSYpEgLx9k/edit> >>>>>>> was made available on user@ >>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/269cbffb04a0fbfe2ec298c3e95f01c05b47b5a72838004d27b74169@%3Cuser.spark.apache.org%3E> >>>>>>> and dev@ >>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c4c9c9d31caa4a9be3dd99444e597b43f7cd2823e456be9f108e8193@%3Cdev.spark.apache.org%3E> >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> collect input. You can also find a sketch design doc attached to >>>>>>> SPARK-26028 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26028>. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your >>>>>>> vote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP. >>>>>>> +0: Don't really care. >>>>>>> -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following >>>>>>> technical reasons. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Xiangrui >>>>>>> >>>>>>
