+1 This will be a great long-term investment for Spark. On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 8:44 AM Marco Gaido <marcogaid...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 from me as well. > > Il giorno mer 6 feb 2019 alle ore 16:58 Yanbo Liang <yblia...@gmail.com> > ha scritto: > >> +1 for the proposal >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:46 PM Mingjie Tang <tangr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1, this is a very very important feature. >>> >>> Mingjie >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:42 AM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Change my vote from +1 to ++1 >>>> >>>> Xiangrui Meng <men...@gmail.com> 于2019年1月30日周三 上午6:20写道： >>>> >>>>> Correction: +0 vote doesn't mean "Don't really care". Thanks Ryan for >>>>> the offline reminder! Below is the Apache official interpretation >>>>> <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#expressing-votes-1-0-1-and-fractions> >>>>> of fraction values: >>>>> >>>>> The in-between values are indicative of how strongly the voting >>>>> individual feels. Here are some examples of fractional votes and ways in >>>>> which they might be intended and interpreted: >>>>> +0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with this.' >>>>> -0: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't do this.' >>>>> -0.5: 'I don't like this idea, but I can't find any rational >>>>> justification for my feelings.' >>>>> ++1: 'Wow! I like this! Let's do it!' >>>>> -0.9: 'I really don't like this, but I'm not going to stand in the way >>>>> if everyone else wants to go ahead with it.' >>>>> +0.9: 'This is a cool idea and i like it, but I don't have time/the >>>>> skills necessary to help out.' >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:31 AM Martin Junghanns >>>>> <martin.jungha...@neotechnology.com.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Dongjoon, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the hint! I updated the SPIP accordingly. >>>>>> >>>>>> I also changed the access permissions for the SPIP and design sketch >>>>>> docs so that anyone can comment. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> Martin >>>>>> On 29.01.19 18:59, Dongjoon Hyun wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, Xiangrui Meng. >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 for the proposal. >>>>>> >>>>>> However, please update the following section for this vote. As we >>>>>> see, it seems to be inaccurate because today is Jan. 29th. (Almost >>>>>> February). >>>>>> (Since I cannot comment on the SPIP, I replied here.) >>>>>> >>>>>> Q7. How long will it take? >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> If accepted by the community by the end of December 2018, we >>>>>> predict to be feature complete by mid-end March, allowing for QA >>>>>> during >>>>>> April 2019, making the SPIP part of the next major Spark release >>>>>> (3.0, ETA >>>>>> May, 2019). >>>>>> >>>>>> Bests, >>>>>> Dongjoon. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:52 AM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jules Damji <dmat...@comcast.net> 于2019年1月29日周二 上午8:14写道： >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>> (Heard their proposed tech-talk at Spark + A.I summit in London. >>>>>>>> Well attended & well received.) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>>> Pardon the dumb thumb typos :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jan 29, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> yay - let's do it! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:28 AM Xiangrui Meng <men...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994 >>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25994>. It >>>>>>>>> introduces a new DataFrame-based component to Spark, which supports >>>>>>>>> property graph construction, Cypher queries, and graph algorithms. The >>>>>>>>> proposal >>>>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ljqVsAh2wxTZS8XqwDQgRT6i_mania3ffYSYpEgLx9k/edit> >>>>>>>>> was made available on user@ >>>>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/269cbffb04a0fbfe2ec298c3e95f01c05b47b5a72838004d27b74169@%3Cuser.spark.apache.org%3E> >>>>>>>>> and dev@ >>>>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c4c9c9d31caa4a9be3dd99444e597b43f7cd2823e456be9f108e8193@%3Cdev.spark.apache.org%3E> >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> collect input. You can also find a sketch design doc attached to >>>>>>>>> SPARK-26028 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26028>. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your >>>>>>>>> vote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP. >>>>>>>>> +0: Don't really care. >>>>>>>>> -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following >>>>>>>>> technical reasons. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> Xiangrui >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- Joseph Bradley Software Engineer - Machine Learning Databricks, Inc. [image: http://databricks.com] <http://databricks.com/>
