Change my vote from +1 to ++1 Xiangrui Meng <men...@gmail.com> 于2019年1月30日周三 上午6:20写道：
> Correction: +0 vote doesn't mean "Don't really care". Thanks Ryan for the > offline reminder! Below is the Apache official interpretation > <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#expressing-votes-1-0-1-and-fractions> > of fraction values: > > The in-between values are indicative of how strongly the voting individual > feels. Here are some examples of fractional votes and ways in which they > might be intended and interpreted: > +0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with this.' > -0: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't do this.' > -0.5: 'I don't like this idea, but I can't find any rational justification > for my feelings.' > ++1: 'Wow! I like this! Let's do it!' > -0.9: 'I really don't like this, but I'm not going to stand in the way if > everyone else wants to go ahead with it.' > +0.9: 'This is a cool idea and i like it, but I don't have time/the skills > necessary to help out.' > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:31 AM Martin Junghanns > <martin.jungha...@neotechnology.com.invalid> wrote: > >> Hi Dongjoon, >> >> Thanks for the hint! I updated the SPIP accordingly. >> >> I also changed the access permissions for the SPIP and design sketch docs >> so that anyone can comment. >> >> Best, >> >> Martin >> On 29.01.19 18:59, Dongjoon Hyun wrote: >> >> Hi, Xiangrui Meng. >> >> +1 for the proposal. >> >> However, please update the following section for this vote. As we see, it >> seems to be inaccurate because today is Jan. 29th. (Almost February). >> (Since I cannot comment on the SPIP, I replied here.) >> >> Q7. How long will it take? >> >> - >> >> If accepted by the community by the end of December 2018, we predict >> to be feature complete by mid-end March, allowing for QA during April >> 2019, >> making the SPIP part of the next major Spark release (3.0, ETA May, 2019). >> >> Bests, >> Dongjoon. >> >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:52 AM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Jules Damji <dmat...@comcast.net> 于2019年1月29日周二 上午8:14写道： >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> (Heard their proposed tech-talk at Spark + A.I summit in London. Well >>>> attended & well received.) >>>> >>>> — >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> Pardon the dumb thumb typos :) >>>> >>>> On Jan 29, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> yay - let's do it! >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:28 AM Xiangrui Meng <men...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994 >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25994>. It introduces a >>>>> new DataFrame-based component to Spark, which supports property graph >>>>> construction, Cypher queries, and graph algorithms. The proposal >>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ljqVsAh2wxTZS8XqwDQgRT6i_mania3ffYSYpEgLx9k/edit> >>>>> was made available on user@ >>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/269cbffb04a0fbfe2ec298c3e95f01c05b47b5a72838004d27b74169@%3Cuser.spark.apache.org%3E> >>>>> and dev@ >>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c4c9c9d31caa4a9be3dd99444e597b43f7cd2823e456be9f108e8193@%3Cdev.spark.apache.org%3E> >>>>> to >>>>> collect input. You can also find a sketch design doc attached to >>>>> SPARK-26028 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26028>. >>>>> >>>>> The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your vote: >>>>> >>>>> +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP. >>>>> +0: Don't really care. >>>>> -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following >>>>> technical reasons. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Xiangrui >>>>> >>>>
