You may have noticed that the counter of searchable items for last 7 days on search-Hadoop is 0 and the counter for last 30 days is declining quickly.
Cheers On Dec 19, 2013, at 10:10 PM, Nick Pentreath <nick.pentre...@gmail.com> wrote: > One option that is 3rd party that works nicely for the Hadoop project and > it's related projects is http://search-hadoop.com - managed by sematext. > Perhaps we can plead with Otis to add Spark lists to search-spark.com, or the > existing site? > > Just throwing it out there as a potential solution to at least searching and > navigating the Apache lists > > Sent from my iPad > >> On 20 Dec 2013, at 6:46 AM, Aaron Davidson <ilike...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I'd be fine with one-way mirrors here (Apache threads being reflected in >> Google groups) -- I have no idea how one is supposed to navigate the Apache >> list to look for historic threads. >> >> >>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Mike Potts <maspo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks very much for the prompt and comprehensive reply! I appreciate the >>> overarching desire to integrate with apache: I'm very happy to hear that >>> there's a move to use the existing groups as mirrors: that will overcome >>> all of my objections: particularly if it's bidirectional! :) >>> >>> >>>> On Thursday, December 19, 2013 7:19:06 PM UTC-8, Andy Konwinski wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey Mike, >>>> >>>> As you probably noticed when you CC'd spark-de...@googlegroups.com, that >>>> list has already be reconfigured so that it no longer allows posting (and >>>> bounces emails sent to it). >>>> >>>> We will be doing the same thing to the spark...@googlegroups.com list >>>> too (we'll announce a date for that soon). >>>> >>>> That may sound very frustrating, and you are *not* alone feeling that >>>> way. We've had a long conversation with our mentors about this, and I've >>>> felt very similar to you, so I'd like to give you background. >>>> >>>> As I'm coming to see it, part of becoming an Apache project is moving the >>>> community *fully* over to Apache infrastructure, and more generally the >>>> Apache way of organizing the community. >>>> >>>> This applies in both the nuts-and-bolts sense of being on apache infra, >>>> but possibly more importantly, it is also a guiding principle and way of >>>> thinking. >>>> >>>> In various ways, moving to apache Infra can be a painful process, and IMO >>>> the loss of all the great mailing list functionality that comes with using >>>> Google Groups is perhaps the most painful step. But basically, the de facto >>>> mailing lists need to be the Apache ones, and not Google Groups. The >>>> underlying reason is that Apache needs to take full accountability for >>>> recording and publishing the mailing lists, it has to be able to >>>> institutionally guarantee this. This is because discussion on mailing lists >>>> is one of the core things that defines an Apache community. So at a minimum >>>> this means Apache owning the master copy of the bits. >>>> >>>> All that said, we are discussing the possibility of having a google group >>>> that subscribes to each list that would provide an easier to use and >>>> prettier archive for each list (so far we haven't gotten that to work). >>>> >>>> I hope this was helpful. It has taken me a few years now, and a lot of >>>> conversations with experienced (and patient!) Apache mentors, to >>>> internalize some of the nuance about "the Apache way". That's why I wanted >>>> to share. >>>> >>>> Andy >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Mike Potts <masp...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I notice that there are still a lot of active topics in this group: and >>>>> also activity on the apache mailing list (which is a really horrible >>>>> experience!). Is it a firm policy on apache's front to disallow external >>>>> groups? I'm going to be ramping up on spark, and I really hate the idea >>>>> of >>>>> having to rely on the apache archives and my mail client. Also: having to >>>>> search for topics/keywords both in old threads (here) as well as new >>>>> threads in apache's (clunky) archive, is going to be a pain! I almost >>>>> feel >>>>> like I must be missing something because the current solution seems >>>>> unfeasibly awkward! >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Spark Users" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to spark-users...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>> >>>>
