I actually prefer that, but I didn't want my preference to get in the way of creating mirror groups, one way or the other :) (My argument would be that since the old groups would be closing anyway, re-purposing them as mirrors is fair use: and less work/confusing than creating new *-mirror groups instead.)
On Friday, December 20, 2013 8:29:40 AM UTC-8, Andy Konwinski wrote: > > That would be really awesome. I'm not familiar with any Google Groups > functionality that supports that but I'll look. > > That's an argument for maybe just changing the names of the existing > groups to something with mirror in them instead of using newly created ones. >
