> On Oct. 25, 2014, 3:23 p.m., Jarek Cecho wrote:
> > common/pom.xml, line 27
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27196/diff/1/?file=733341#file733341line27>
> >
> >     We're currently using 2.0.0 on head of "sqoop2" branch, to iterate that 
> > it's our goal. What is the reason to change it to 1.99.4?
> 
> Veena Basavaraj wrote:
>     >>this may not be the correct place to change this, but I am looking for 
> answers.
>     
>     >>Ideally this should not be 2.0.0 until we really have a sqoop2 release. 
> Can someone explain why we call it sqoop2 when we release as 1.99 versions?
>     
>     
>     It is just confusing for a new bie to see 1.99.4 release version and docs 
> and have 2.0.0 returned in here.

Not really, the branch is called "sqoop2" so it seems reasonable that it builds 
2.0.0-SNAPSHOT, right? :) It's just the release branch "branch-1.99.x" where we 
are changing the version to "1.99.x".


> On Oct. 25, 2014, 3:23 p.m., Jarek Cecho wrote:
> > common/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/common/VersionInfo.java, line 36
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27196/diff/1/?file=733343#file733343line36>
> >
> >     This will return the version of the code, it can be both on client or 
> > server, depending where the sqoop-common jar will be loaded.
> 
> Veena Basavaraj wrote:
>     so does code version make it more apt? Just want the docs to be more 
> clearer atleast.
> 
> Veena Basavaraj wrote:
>     Lets call it build version or release version. I prefer build version 
> since it actually indicates the package information for the sqoop

Sure.


> On Oct. 25, 2014, 3:23 p.m., Jarek Cecho wrote:
> > common/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/common/VersionInfo.java, line 37
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27196/diff/1/?file=733343#file733343line37>
> >
> >     Seems as unnecessary cosmetic change?
> 
> Veena Basavaraj wrote:
>     sure. Some of it was just when I reading the code and utterly confused 
> why we use 2.0.0 when we are not there yet. publicly if we were calling this 
> 2.0.0 alpha it would be lot lot less confusing

I think that we've cover that here (already linked in previous comment, just 
for posterity):

http://markmail.org/message/5jygqqy3oryxqdib


> On Oct. 25, 2014, 3:23 p.m., Jarek Cecho wrote:
> > shell/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/shell/core/Constants.java, lines 
> > 296-301
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27196/diff/1/?file=733350#file733350line296>
> >
> >     I'm wondering why we are changing the order here? The order is 
> > intentionally bottom down, e.g. from most generic word to most concrete 
> > one, so that if you sort all properties you'll always get context (you can 
> > see all properties for given part of the code, ...)
> 
> Veena Basavaraj wrote:
>     I have no idea what this ordering was there
>     
>     But reading it as common english, I would say client version rather than 
> version client
>     
>     but this is not my biggest worry. :) I will change it back and say in one 
> line of comment why it is named this way. !

Yeah, I hear you, it's not a common english on purpose though :)


- Jarek


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27196/#review58504
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 25, 2014, 4:09 p.m., Veena Basavaraj wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/27196/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 25, 2014, 4:09 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop and Jarek Cecho.
> 
> 
> Repository: sqoop-sqoop2
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> see JIRA for details
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   common/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/common/VersionAnnotation.java acd901f 
>   common/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/common/VersionInfo.java dcf522f 
>   common/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/json/VersionBean.java 029a776 
>   common/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/common/TestVersionInfo.java 27d78f4 
>   
> connector/connector-generic-jdbc/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/jdbc/GenericJdbcConnector.java
>  8469064 
>   
> connector/connector-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/hdfs/HdfsConnector.java
>  cce0e29 
>   server/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/handler/VersionRequestHandler.java 
> 64c4536 
>   shell/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/shell/ShowVersionFunction.java 4e7ad38 
>   shell/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/shell/core/Constants.java f2bbe7f 
>   shell/src/main/resources/shell-resource.properties e2381dd 
>   test/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/integration/server/VersionTest.java 
> beed82e 
>   tools/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/tools/ToolRunner.java 769c2b4 
>   tools/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/tools/tool/RepositoryDumpTool.java 
> 534877f 
>   tools/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/tools/tool/RepositoryLoadTool.java 
> 45c21a1 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27196/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> yet to be.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Veena Basavaraj
> 
>

Reply via email to