[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14191879#comment-14191879
]
Jarek Jarcec Cecho commented on SQOOP-1644:
-------------------------------------------
I'm afraid that having two systems doing the same will be confusing for the
connector developer especially when/if there will be conflicts (what if one
system says that it's optional and second will say that it's required)? I agree
that simple things should be simple to do, but that doesn't mean that we have
to have two systems for that, right? We can design the conditions in a way that
there will be easy way to specify "always optional" or "always required".
> Sqoop2: Enhance the connector/ driver config input options for better
> usability
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SQOOP-1644
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1644
> Project: Sqoop
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Veena Basavaraj
> Assignee: Veena Basavaraj
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> The goal is to have much better user experience when user has to fill out the
> values for config inputs in the UI/ shell client.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
