On 29 November 2013 05:33, Lakmal Warusawithana <[email protected]> wrote: > Honestly, to me , I feel that , "we are" is "active PPMC/committers", but > problem may that, current all active committers are from WSO2.
This is only true if a "we" statement can be backed up with a public mailing list thread where the community reached consensus. (Otherwise how can one person say "we" and mean anything other than "I" or "me and some people I talked to in private".) But I do not think we have that. So these "we" statements sound like they refer to internal WSO2 consensus. That's the nub of the problem. > But I agreed, we (committers) should clearly discuss these things in dev > list, because who are not actively following the developments may confuse > with the process. Will work on these items and will correct the process. Cool. But note: it's not that we need to be clearer about our process for people who are less familiar. It's that decisions to cut milestones (or releases) need to be taken by the community, and on the dev list. At the moment, the decisions appear to be unilateral. i.e. Arriving on the list as foregone conclusions. So, in this particular instance, a better approach might be to post a DISCUSS thread proposing a milestone and asking for comments, feedback, etc. -- Noah Slater https://twitter.com/nslater
