On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 29 November 2013 05:33, Lakmal Warusawithana <[email protected]> wrote: > > Honestly, to me , I feel that , "we are" is "active PPMC/committers", but > > problem may that, current all active committers are from WSO2. > > This is only true if a "we" statement can be backed up with a public > mailing list thread where the community reached consensus. (Otherwise > how can one person say "we" and mean anything other than "I" or "me > and some people I talked to in private".) > > But I do not think we have that. So these "we" statements sound like > they refer to internal WSO2 consensus. > > That's the nub of the problem. > > > But I agreed, we (committers) should clearly discuss these things in dev > > list, because who are not actively following the developments may confuse > > with the process. Will work on these items and will correct the process. > > Cool. > > But note: it's not that we need to be clearer about our process for > people who are less familiar. It's that decisions to cut milestones > (or releases) need to be taken by the community, and on the dev list. > At the moment, the decisions appear to be unilateral. i.e. Arriving on > the list as foregone conclusions. > > So, in this particular instance, a better approach might be to post a > DISCUSS thread proposing a milestone and asking for comments, > feedback, etc. > > Yes, I already add this into milestone build process which i started discussion in a separate thread. > -- > Noah Slater > https://twitter.com/nslater > -- Lakmal Warusawithana Software Architect; WSO2 Inc. Mobile : +94714289692 Blog : http://lakmalsview.blogspot.com/
