Hi, Tim! Hope the Email finds you well. I want to state again: No one could guess exactly and achieve the results you want, if you don't give a clear task. Without mentor‘s suggestions, a beginner could not do well in a helpless environment, right? A mentor is really important and could help a lot, even just to explain the task clearly and describe the expectations clearly. Therefore, instead of always being silent in the discussion and PR comments and telling me I could not achieve the OSPP challenge in private Email, please tell me what are your requirements in detailed. I will try my best to achieve these requirements and I have confidence I can achieve them.
Looking forward to hearing from you! By the way, although you ignore my advice before, which is maybe a Zoom meeting or Teams meeting could help to explain the things clearly, I still want to ask for one meeting at your convenience. Q Yang <[email protected]> 于2023年10月13日周五 17:38写道： > Hi Tim, > > I was surprised to hear you mention that you and others in the community > dislike my PR, as I have not received any feedback from others. In > addition, to avoid missing your Email and causing mistakes, I checked my > email box. I do not think I have received any valuable feedback or > suggestions from you since you published the OSPP task as a mentor (as > shown in the attachment email file), except the comments in the PR today. > Consequently, I'm astonished that I do not meet the requirements. > > > I still have a few questions that I want to clarify: > > > The most important thing is: which part of the challenge do you believe I > do not complete? My current implementation is based on the task description > in OSPP and the proposal I submitted(which is reviewed and accepted by > you). The entire technical implementation process has fully implemented all > the details and has achieved the function of having pre-set assets when > opening StreamPipes. > > From your reply, I did not see any challenge which is impossible > to achieve. Here are all points I extracted from your email reply and PR > reply that need to be improved: > > 1. Enrich the assets in the PR. Your description of the asset is > confusing. Could you please give a rough description and an example? > 2. In the documentation, clearly describe which components are in the > default assets and provide a detailed description of each component. > 3. Adjust the method to wait for backend service. > > Could you please explicitly tell me whether fixing these three points > will allow me to complete the challenge? If so, I can finish it quickly. > If not, please tell me the reason. > > > Best wishes! > Qian Yang > 2023.10.13 > > > Q Yang <[email protected]> 于2023年10月13日周五 16:05写道： > >> >> >> Tim Bossenmaier <[email protected]>于2023年10月13日 周五15:25写道： >> >>> Hi Qian Yang, >>> >>> I've just added some comments to your PR in the StreamPipes repository. >>> >>> Additionally, I just want to make it clear that (as mentioned in earlier >>> emails) the two existing PRs in their current state are not sufficient to >>> pass the OSPP challenge. This is not only my personal opinion, but also the >>> opinion of other Apache StreamPipes PMC members. >>> To emphasise this even more than in the PR comments, we simply feel that >>> the assets provided in the PR are not suitable for our goal of creating a >>> fascinating experience for first-time users of Apache StreamPipes. >>> Furthermore, the documentation you provide in the streampipes-website >>> repository does not guide the user. Sure, it clearly describes how to use >>> Quickstart mode from a technical perspective, but otherwise I think first >>> time users are lost once they open StreamPipes. Ideally, this part of the >>> documentation would not only show the user how to start the Quickstart >>> mode, but also guide them through their first steps in StreamPipes and >>> explain the resources available. >>> >>> I hope I have made my points clear and left no questions unanswered. If >>> so, feel free to contact me again. >>> In general, your contribution is good on a technical level, but it's >>> just not enough to meet the requirements of the challenge. >>> >>> Best regards >>> Tim >>> >>> -------- Originalnachricht -------- >>> Betreff: Request for PR review >>> Datum: 10.10.2023 11:23 >>> Von: Q Yang <[email protected]> >>> An: Tim Bossenmaier <[email protected]> >>> >>> Hi,Tim! >>> I notice that you have approved luoluoyuyu's PR, could you please review >>> my PR and give me some suggestions? If my PR has some problems, I'd like >>> to change it as soon as possible. Before the end of the month, I still >>> could change the PR. Could you give me a chance so that I could do it >>> better? >>> >>> Best wishes! >>> Qian Yang >>> 10.10 >>> >> >
