Dear Qian, to clarify the point I made in my previous mail: Please don't include the dev list in your mails, which is for technical exchange. Our community follows the ASF Code of Conduct, which you can find at [1]. We don't discuss personal matters over public channels and don't forward privately sent mails to public channels.
You will get a response over private channels. Since we are all volunteers, please allow that people might not be available over the weekend due to other obligations. Thanks for your understanding. Best, Dominik [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct#:~:text=Be%20careful%20in%20the%20words,or%20put%20down%20other%20participants. On 2023/10/14 13:39:16 Q Yang wrote: > Hi, Tim! > Hope the Email finds you well. > > I want to state again: No one could guess exactly and achieve the results > you want, if you don't give a clear task. Without mentor‘s suggestions, a > beginner could not do well in a helpless environment, right? A mentor is > really important and could help a lot, even just to explain the task > clearly and describe the expectations clearly. Therefore, instead of always > being silent in the discussion and PR comments and telling me I could not > achieve the OSPP challenge in private Email, please tell me what are your > requirements in detailed. I will try my best to achieve these requirements > and I have confidence I can achieve them. > > Looking forward to hearing from you! > > By the way, although you ignore my advice before, which is maybe a Zoom > meeting or Teams meeting could help to explain the things clearly, I still > want to ask for one meeting at your convenience. > > Q Yang <[email protected]> 于2023年10月13日周五 17:38写道： > > > Hi Tim, > > > > I was surprised to hear you mention that you and others in the community > > dislike my PR, as I have not received any feedback from others. In > > addition, to avoid missing your Email and causing mistakes, I checked my > > email box. I do not think I have received any valuable feedback or > > suggestions from you since you published the OSPP task as a mentor (as > > shown in the attachment email file), except the comments in the PR today. > > Consequently, I'm astonished that I do not meet the requirements. > > > > > > I still have a few questions that I want to clarify: > > > > > > The most important thing is: which part of the challenge do you believe I > > do not complete? My current implementation is based on the task description > > in OSPP and the proposal I submitted(which is reviewed and accepted by > > you). The entire technical implementation process has fully implemented all > > the details and has achieved the function of having pre-set assets when > > opening StreamPipes. > > > > From your reply, I did not see any challenge which is impossible > > to achieve. Here are all points I extracted from your email reply and PR > > reply that need to be improved: > > > > 1. Enrich the assets in the PR. Your description of the asset is > > confusing. Could you please give a rough description and an example? > > 2. In the documentation, clearly describe which components are in the > > default assets and provide a detailed description of each component. > > 3. Adjust the method to wait for backend service. > > > > Could you please explicitly tell me whether fixing these three points > > will allow me to complete the challenge? If so, I can finish it quickly. > > If not, please tell me the reason. > > > > > > Best wishes! > > Qian Yang > > 2023.10.13 > > > > > > Q Yang <[email protected]> 于2023年10月13日周五 16:05写道： > > > >> > >> > >> Tim Bossenmaier <[email protected]>于2023年10月13日 周五15:25写道： > >> > >>> Hi Qian Yang, > >>> > >>> I've just added some comments to your PR in the StreamPipes repository. > >>> > >>> Additionally, I just want to make it clear that (as mentioned in earlier > >>> emails) the two existing PRs in their current state are not sufficient to > >>> pass the OSPP challenge. This is not only my personal opinion, but also > >>> the > >>> opinion of other Apache StreamPipes PMC members. > >>> To emphasise this even more than in the PR comments, we simply feel that > >>> the assets provided in the PR are not suitable for our goal of creating a > >>> fascinating experience for first-time users of Apache StreamPipes. > >>> Furthermore, the documentation you provide in the streampipes-website > >>> repository does not guide the user. Sure, it clearly describes how to use > >>> Quickstart mode from a technical perspective, but otherwise I think first > >>> time users are lost once they open StreamPipes. Ideally, this part of the > >>> documentation would not only show the user how to start the Quickstart > >>> mode, but also guide them through their first steps in StreamPipes and > >>> explain the resources available. > >>> > >>> I hope I have made my points clear and left no questions unanswered. If > >>> so, feel free to contact me again. > >>> In general, your contribution is good on a technical level, but it's > >>> just not enough to meet the requirements of the challenge. > >>> > >>> Best regards > >>> Tim > >>> > >>> -------- Originalnachricht -------- > >>> Betreff: Request for PR review > >>> Datum: 10.10.2023 11:23 > >>> Von: Q Yang <[email protected]> > >>> An: Tim Bossenmaier <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> Hi,Tim! > >>> I notice that you have approved luoluoyuyu's PR, could you please review > >>> my PR and give me some suggestions? If my PR has some problems, I'd like > >>> to change it as soon as possible. Before the end of the month, I still > >>> could change the PR. Could you give me a chance so that I could do it > >>> better? > >>> > >>> Best wishes! > >>> Qian Yang > >>> 10.10 > >>> > >> > > >
