There is obviously a strong push from some people to move struts to subversion. I have no idea at all what subversion offers as benefits, but I can say that I know it will create some immediate problems for me. I use eclipse and I enjoy wonderful tools support for CVS. This is also the case across the board with winCVS, Tortise, and others. What happens to those of us used to using tools to work with our version control. Subversion is not nearly as supported as CVS. There is a Subversion Eclipse plugin, but I think it is still in beta and only works with some point release of subversion. Not exactly the upgrade I would be hoping for.
Michael On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:57:04 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:41:32 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: > > * Did we end up deciding to stick with CVS versus Subversion? I > > know the infrastructure team would be happier if we switched to > > svn ... I haven't > > played with it enough to form an opinion on that yet. > > I would be +1 for Subversion. > > I could also host a SVN repository for us, temporarily. > > -Ted. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
