Yes, you're right.  I missed that when I changed the others before.
Niall has already fixed this in CVS (6 hours ago).

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kunal Parikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 12:15 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
> 
> 
> The taglib URI for struts-el is 
> http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el
> 
> Should this URI really be http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles-el
> 
> Note: the non-el version seems to be more in line with the 
> other taglib URIs http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Kunal
> 
> 
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> 
> >Martin,
> >
> >I tested out the Struts 1.2.3 binary distribution you 
> uploaded. The JDK 
> >issue is resolved but the wrong version of the validator jar 
> is still 
> >being shipped. Now though its more consistent because the "lib" 
> >distribution also has the wrong jar as well :-)
> >
> >The disappointing thing from my point of view was that I put a 
> >checklist for testing various JDK/Tomcat flavours in the 
> Struts 1.2.2 
> >release plan - but it was removed. If they had been left in the plan 
> >then the JDK issues would have been caught.
> >
> >I've set up a new plan for Struts 1.2.3 on the wiki:
> >
> >http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123
> >
> >Niall
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:28 AM
> >Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >>On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 05:16:44 +0100, Niall Pemberton 
> >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>    
> >>
> >>>I've just got round to testing Struts 1.2.2 and found the following
> >>>      
> >>>
> >major
> >  
> >
> >>>problems:
> >>>
> >>>* The binary distribution contains the wrong version of commons
> >>>      
> >>>
> >validator
> >  
> >
> >>>jar (the lib distribution seems to have the right one).
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>This leads me to believe that the binary and lib distros come from 
> >>different builds, which seems pretty odd. The 'release' 
> target builds 
> >>everything at once.
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>* Struts 1.2.2 is incompatible with JDK 1.3 because it uses
> >>>Boolean.valueOf(boolean) introduced in JDK 1.4
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>This was my fault for doing what FindBugs told me. ;-{ Pity nobody 
> >>caught it before 1.2.2 went out.
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Also this distribution has been built/packaged differently to 
> >>>previous releases and IMO we should be doing things consistently:
> >>>
> >>>* The binary distribution zip file explodes to
> >>>      
> >>>
> >jakarta-struts-1.2.2/dist/
> >  
> >
> >>>directory rather than just jakarta-struts-1.2.2/
> >>>* The source distribution zip file explodes to jakarta-struts 
> >>>directory rather than jakarta-struts-1.2.2-src
> >>>* The source distribution contains all the CVS directories 
> and files
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>This is very strange. I just ran 'ant release' on my local 
> system, and 
> >>it worked just fine, creating all of the uploads correctly. 
> I see none 
> >>of the above issues. Perhaps James built the distros some 
> other way? 
> >>Not sure.
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>James has just fixed the JDK 1.3 incompatibilities in CVS 
> but I would
> >>>      
> >>>
> >say we
> >  
> >
> >>>need to downgrade the 1.2.2 version from a GA quality 
> release and cut 
> >>>a
> >>>      
> >>>
> >new
> >  
> >
> >>>one.
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>Yes indeed. I've updated the build version, rolled a new release 
> >>distribution, and am in the process of uploading it to 
> cvs.apache.org. 
> >>I have not tested it yet, and have not signed it, but if 
> people have 
> >>the chance to try it out, that would be very helpful.
> >>
> >>--
> >>Martin Cooper
> >>
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Niall
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to