> but there aren't > copies either on struts.apache.org or > jakarata.apache.org/struts. Anyone know if this is an issue?
jup, but in struts.jar$/META-INF/tlds there are the *.tlds like for JSF: --> <%@ taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"; prefix="h" %> <%@ taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"; prefix="f" %> Matze > Niall > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:57 AM > Subject: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?) > > > > I saw in CVS, > > > > that URI for Struts-Faces points > > also to Jakarta: > > <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-faces</uri> > > > > > > @struts-el: > > only tiles-el points to jakarta > > (in Struts 1.2.3) <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-bean-el</uri> > > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-html-el</uri> > > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-logic-el</uri> > > <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el</uri> > > > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Kunal Parikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:15 AM > > > To: Struts Developers List > > > Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water? > > > > > > > > > The taglib URI for struts-el is > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el > > > > > > Should this URI really be http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles-el > > > > > > Note: the non-el version seems to be more in line with the other > > > taglib URIs http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles > > > > > > HTH, > > > > > > Kunal > > > > > > > > > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > > > > >Martin, > > > > > > > >I tested out the Struts 1.2.3 binary distribution you > > > uploaded. The JDK > > > >issue is resolved but the wrong version of the validator jar > > > is still > > > >being shipped. Now though its more consistent because the "lib" > > > >distribution also has the wrong jar as well :-) > > > > > > > >The disappointing thing from my point of view was that I put a > > > >checklist for testing various JDK/Tomcat flavours in the > > > Struts 1.2.2 > > > >release plan - but it was removed. If they had been left in the > > > >plan then the JDK issues would have been caught. > > > > > > > >I've set up a new plan for Struts 1.2.3 on the wiki: > > > > > > > >http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123 > > > > > > > >Niall > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > >From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:28 AM > > > >Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 05:16:44 +0100, Niall Pemberton > > > >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>I've just got round to testing Struts 1.2.2 and found the > > > >>>following > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >major > > > > > > > > > > > >>>problems: > > > >>> > > > >>>* The binary distribution contains the wrong version of commons > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >validator > > > > > > > > > > > >>>jar (the lib distribution seems to have the right one). > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>This leads me to believe that the binary and lib > distros come from > > > >>different builds, which seems pretty odd. The 'release' > > > target builds > > > >>everything at once. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>* Struts 1.2.2 is incompatible with JDK 1.3 because it uses > > > >>>Boolean.valueOf(boolean) introduced in JDK 1.4 > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>This was my fault for doing what FindBugs told me. ;-{ > Pity nobody > > > >>caught it before 1.2.2 went out. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>Also this distribution has been built/packaged differently to > > > >>>previous releases and IMO we should be doing things > consistently: > > > >>> > > > >>>* The binary distribution zip file explodes to > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >jakarta-struts-1.2.2/dist/ > > > > > > > > > > > >>>directory rather than just jakarta-struts-1.2.2/ > > > >>>* The source distribution zip file explodes to jakarta-struts > > > >>>directory rather than jakarta-struts-1.2.2-src > > > >>>* The source distribution contains all the CVS directories > > > and files > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>This is very strange. I just ran 'ant release' on my local > > > system, and > > > >>it worked just fine, creating all of the uploads correctly. > > > I see none > > > >>of the above issues. Perhaps James built the distros some > > > other way? > > > >>Not sure. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>James has just fixed the JDK 1.3 incompatibilities in CVS > > > but I would > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >say we > > > > > > > > > > > >>>need to downgrade the 1.2.2 version from a GA quality > > > release and cut > > > >>>a > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >new > > > > > > > > > > > >>>one. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>Yes indeed. I've updated the build version, rolled a > new release > > > >>distribution, and am in the process of uploading it to > > > cvs.apache.org. > > > >>I have not tested it yet, and have not signed it, but if > > > people have > > > >>the chance to try it out, that would be very helpful. > > > >> > > > >>-- > > > >>Martin Cooper > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>Niall > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >-- > > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
