Objectively, I think that Shale would be a better fit for Apache MyFaces. Back in the day, it might have been better if we had placed most of our taglibs with Jakarta Taglibs, rather than keep them all here. I think this is the same sort of thing.
Since I'm not doing the work, I can't make the decision, but I think it would be nice if a serious proposal were made to Apache MyFaces before launching Shale from here. Shale has been mentioned on the MyFaces lists a couple of times, but no one has asked the question "Do we want to host Shale here at Apache MyFaces?". Apache MyFaces already has generic JSF components, and Shale fits in that venue. They also have a very strong JSF community that can appreciate, support, and enhance Shale. Eventually, if everyone migrates to Shale, and the Struts community withers away, then so be it. Let Darwin decide. -Ted. On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:50:42 -0800, Craig McClanahan wrote: > On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:21:24 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Is there anything someone would like put differently? >> > > I'm somewhat curious when the Struts committers might be willing to > make a conscious choice for a Struts 2.x architecture. > > While I'm personally going to continue to support the 1.3.x changes > for evolution of existing apps, and use of the Struts-Faces > integration library with it, I believe that Struts will become > gradually less relevant for new application development unless it > adopts JSF strongly; and it would be a shame to have to *compete* > with Struts instead of *being* Struts. > >> -Ted. >> > Craig > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
