Speaking of apt, there is an XWork tiger package that contains apt
classes, however, Maven won't build it. Could someone more familiar
with APT rename the files from *.java.bak to *.java and configure Maven
to compile them?
Thanks,
Don
Rene Gielen wrote:
Hi Ted, Musachy, others,
I remember this ticket... :-/
Got stuck with maven2 last time I looked into it, before with my daytime
business catched me again.
The ww taglib xdoclet generation was a hack of the original tld generation
stuff from xdoclet1, and that is one of the reasons why it was that hard to
integrate in the new maven build system.
I would really vote for switching apt, too. Annotations is one of the best improvements tiger introduced, und using apt would give us true flexibility while dropping build dependencies. And it is "standard".
For the conversion of javadoc comments to annotations, this would be pretty easy to
do with Idea, some nice regexp replacements & some sensible review. I could
offer my help on this, cause next week I've got some time left :) Btw, we should
also remember the html artifacts produced by the tld generation, needed for snippet
based documentation.
Regards,
Rene
Since we haven't had any takers on fixing the XDoclet
processing, I
doubt that anyone is married to the XDoclet approach.
Meanwhile, other
new features are embracing annotations, so I would
suggest that
annotations would actually be better than the old
XDoclet approach.
After all, XDoclet is basically a precursor to
annotations.
So, if you want to work on an APT patch for WW-1392,
I'll review it.
-Ted.
On 11/16/06, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I was playing with apt
(http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/apt/Getting
Started.html)
today and it is pretty easy to use, I could get the
tld generation
working in a few days, the only thing is that we
would have to use
annotations instead of javadoc comments, would that
be a problem?
musachy
Musachy Barroso wrote:
Could we use apt?
musachy
Ted Husted wrote:
On 11/15/06, Musachy Barroso
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is anything going to be done for the TLD
generation or we are just
going
to update it by hand (that's what I've been
doing anyway) for now?
We'd like to go back to using XDoclet, but need
to workaround
XDoclet's incompatbility with J5.
*
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1392
-Ted.
------------------------------------------------------
---------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------
---------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------
---------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
HTH, Ted.
* http://www.husted.com/struts/
------------------------------------------------------
---------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=49702&messageID=102054#102054
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
