Musachy, > Rene > > I'm getting familiar with apt, if you can replace the > javadocs with > annotations it would be nice (read: spare me the > regexs :)), I think > nothing is using them right now so it won't break > anything. > > musachy
Yes, should be safe to remove them. We have to define the naming / annotation keywords, then we could kick this off (and out) ;) Regards, Rene > > Ted Husted wrote: > > If you and Musachy would like to work this out, > Rene, that would great. > > > > I've quite a bit on my plate already with bringing > the MailReader up > > to speed with all the other excellent changes we've > made this month. > > > > -Ted. > > > > On 11/16/06, Rene Gielen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi Ted, Musachy, others, > >> > >> I remember this ticket... :-/ > >> Got stuck with maven2 last time I looked into it, > before with my > >> daytime business catched me again. > >> > >> The ww taglib xdoclet generation was a hack of the > original tld > >> generation stuff from xdoclet1, and that is one of > the reasons why it > >> was that hard to integrate in the new maven build > system. > >> > >> I would really vote for switching apt, too. > Annotations is one of the > >> best improvements tiger introduced, und using apt > would give us true > >> flexibility while dropping build dependencies. And > it is "standard". > >> > >> For the conversion of javadoc comments to > annotations, this would be > >> pretty easy to do with Idea, some nice regexp > replacements & some > >> sensible review. I could offer my help on this, > cause next week I've > >> got some time left :) Btw, we should also > remember the html > >> artifacts produced by the tld generation, needed > for snippet based > >> documentation. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Rene > >> > >> > Since we haven't had any takers on fixing the > XDoclet > >> > processing, I > >> > doubt that anyone is married to the XDoclet > approach. > >> > Meanwhile, other > >> > new features are embracing annotations, so I > would > >> > suggest that > >> > annotations would actually be better than the > old > >> > XDoclet approach. > >> > After all, XDoclet is basically a precursor to > >> > annotations. > >> > > >> > So, if you want to work on an APT patch for > WW-1392, > >> > I'll review it. > >> > > >> > -Ted. > >> > > >> > On 11/16/06, Musachy Barroso > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > I was playing with apt > >> > > > >> > > (http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/apt/Getting > >> > Started.html) > >> > > today and it is pretty easy to use, I could > get the > >> > tld generation > >> > > working in a few days, the only thing is that > we > >> > would have to use > >> > > annotations instead of javadoc comments, would > that > >> > be a problem? > >> > > > >> > > musachy > >> > > > >> > > Musachy Barroso wrote: > >> > > > Could we use apt? > >> > > > > >> > > > musachy > >> > > > > >> > > > Ted Husted wrote: > >> > > >> On 11/15/06, Musachy Barroso > >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >>> Is anything going to be done for the TLD > >> > generation or we are just > >> > > >>> going > >> > > >>> to update it by hand (that's what I've > been > >> > doing anyway) for now? > >> > > >> > >> > > >> We'd like to go back to using XDoclet, but > need > >> > to workaround > >> > > >> XDoclet's incompatbility with J5. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> * > >> > https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1392 > >> > > >> > >> > > >> -Ted. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > --------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > --------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=49702&messageID=102061#102061 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
