Don, I already renamed them... I will commit them, as soon as the unit tests do pass.
later, Rainer > Speaking of apt, there is an XWork tiger package that contains apt > classes, however, Maven won't build it. Could someone more familiar > with APT rename the files from *.java.bak to *.java and configure Maven > to compile them? > > Thanks, > > Don > > Rene Gielen wrote: >> Hi Ted, Musachy, others, >> >> I remember this ticket... :-/ >> Got stuck with maven2 last time I looked into it, before with my daytime >> business catched me again. >> >> The ww taglib xdoclet generation was a hack of the original tld >> generation stuff from xdoclet1, and that is one of the reasons why it >> was that hard to integrate in the new maven build system. >> >> I would really vote for switching apt, too. Annotations is one of the >> best improvements tiger introduced, und using apt would give us true >> flexibility while dropping build dependencies. And it is "standard". >> >> For the conversion of javadoc comments to annotations, this would be >> pretty easy to do with Idea, some nice regexp replacements & some >> sensible review. I could offer my help on this, cause next week I've got >> some time left :) Btw, we should also remember the html artifacts >> produced by the tld generation, needed for snippet based documentation. >> >> Regards, >> Rene >> >> >>> Since we haven't had any takers on fixing the XDoclet >>> processing, I >>> doubt that anyone is married to the XDoclet approach. >>> Meanwhile, other >>> new features are embracing annotations, so I would >>> suggest that >>> annotations would actually be better than the old >>> XDoclet approach. >>> After all, XDoclet is basically a precursor to >>> annotations. >>> >>> So, if you want to work on an APT patch for WW-1392, >>> I'll review it. >>> >>> -Ted. >>> >>> On 11/16/06, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I was playing with apt >>>> >>>> >>> (http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/apt/Getting >>> Started.html) >>> >>>> today and it is pretty easy to use, I could get the >>>> >>> tld generation >>> >>>> working in a few days, the only thing is that we >>>> >>> would have to use >>> >>>> annotations instead of javadoc comments, would that >>>> >>> be a problem? >>> >>>> musachy >>>> >>>> Musachy Barroso wrote: >>>> >>>>> Could we use apt? >>>>> >>>>> musachy >>>>> >>>>> Ted Husted wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 11/15/06, Musachy Barroso >>>>>> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> Is anything going to be done for the TLD >>>>>>> >>> generation or we are just >>> >>>>>>> going >>>>>>> to update it by hand (that's what I've been >>>>>>> >>> doing anyway) for now? >>> >>>>>> We'd like to go back to using XDoclet, but need >>>>>> >>> to workaround >>> >>>>>> XDoclet's incompatbility with J5. >>>>>> >>>>>> * >>>>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1392 >>> >>>>>> -Ted. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>> --------------- >>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>>>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>> --------------- >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>> --------------- >>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>>> >>> -- >>> HTH, Ted. >>> * http://www.husted.com/struts/ >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>> --------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Posted via Jive Forums >> http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=49702&messageID=102054#102054 >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
