We never really branched the Struts 1 documentation. When a feature applied to a later release, we just said "Since Struts 1.2.9, ...." and kept on going.
I'd suggest that we try and do the same with the Struts 2 docs. If a section or a page only applies to Struts 2.1.0 (the head), we just say "Since Struts 2.1", and so forth. For extra credit, we could also "label" any pages that have a lot of Struts 2.1 content. If the tags are going to be a special problem, then perhaps we should move the tags to their own space, and clone the tag space. -Ted. On 8/21/07, Nils-Helge Garli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's the status for this? Is it possible to "branch" the wiki, or do > we create new pages and "deprecate" the old ones? > > Nils-H > > On 8/2/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think it would be appropriate for 2.1 vs 2.0.x, +1 for it. > > > > musachy > > > > On 8/2/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > For a FedEx day project, one of the Confluence guys created a plugin > > > that allowed you to clone/tag/branch a space. We might want to do the > > > same if new branches significantly differ from the previous. > > > > > > http://blogs.atlassian.com/developer/2007/05/fedex_v_copy_space_plugin.html > > > > > > Don > > > > > > On 8/2/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > That's probably not a good idea, as the ajax-related tags changed > > > > quite a bit on 2.1 now the documentation is pointing to them. > > > > > > > > musachy > > > > > > > > On 8/2/07, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Actual value is > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/site/resources/tags/ > > > > > > > > > > Musachy Barroso schrieb: > > > > > > is the "struts2-tags" cwiki variable pointing to svn trunk or the > > > > > > branch? > > > > > > > > > > > > musachy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
