On Apr 11, 2007, at 3:30 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
From all what I see coming along I'm happy that we will have a
dedicated
citation field. This is not due to implementation issues but due to the
fact that it's always good to have an exact specification about what
you
are going to do.
Yes, although I guess there are trade-offs in the different approaches.
If a field is too specific, then it is probably less likely to be
implemented. If it's too generic, then it might be widely implemented,
but maybe not so consistently.
My goal, of course, is that whatever gets implemented AND that it's
consistent.
I wonder if we should have an IRC chat with Svante about this? We're
talking about the metadata field in the SC concall today.
Bruce
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
