Hi Ruwan,
 
ok, sounds good. I'm not aware of something well known and widely used which 
uses port 8243. So I'm +1 on this. ;-)

________________________________

Ooopppseee, I just realized that I missed the dev list from my original reply,

Cc:ing dev list

Thanks,
Ruwan


On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Ruwan Linton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


        Thanks Paul, but 4433 is not listed even there.
        
        Anyway I checked 8243 there and it seems OK.
        
        Mark/Eric and all, what do you think about 8243 as the https port.
        
        Thanks,
        Ruwan 

<<winmail.dat>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to