>OpenSSL, 4443 => 4433 Oops, typo, and off-topic but: I've seen 4443 and 4343 widely used for alternate SSL ports. I believe 4433 is OpenSLL's default install port. Evidence of confusion to avoid, but point already taken...
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 5:20 AM, Mark Carranza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >43 suffix > Good idea, How about 80 suffix?: > HTTP 8280 > HTTPS 8243 > > --Mark > > (I'm buried (Founder: 1st startup, 1st month)) If someone knows OpenSSL > and it's default ports well enough (not me, but I have seen 4443 used often > enough), please add them, with references, to the > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers page. > Thanks! > > > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Ruwan Linton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Ooopppseee, I just realized that I missed the dev list from my original >> reply, >> >> Cc:ing dev list >> >> Thanks, >> Ruwan >> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Ruwan Linton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> > Thanks Paul, but 4433 is not listed even there. >> > >> > Anyway I checked 8243 there and it seems OK. >> > >> > Mark/Eric and all, what do you think about 8243 as the https port. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Ruwan >> > >> > >> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Ruwan >> >> >> >> This page is useful because it shows common usage as well as official >> >> assignment: >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers >> >> >> >> Eric - based on the usual Apache rules we actually encourage you to >> >> vote. Ok I know this sounds wierd, but seriously the way that Apache >> >> works is that it encourages everyone in the community to vote, but for >> >> certain decisions only committers or PMC members are legally "binding >> >> votes" according to Apache rules. But, of course, the voting still is >> >> important information. Usually Apache votes don't end up in a "count" >> >> because we work towards consensus, so for most situations, we take all >> >> the input of the community, binding or not. >> >> >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Ruwan Linton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hhhmmm.... :-( >> >> > >> >> > I just checked the IANA [1] registered ports and found that 4433 is >> not >> >> > registered. >> >> > >> >> > Anyway I think openssl is widely used and we should change it, how >> about >> >> > 8243 (I don't like consecutive ports to be used as http and https) >> ports >> >> end >> >> > with 43 gives you some meaning of https because 443 is the default >> https >> >> > port :-) >> >> > >> >> > WDYT? >> >> > >> >> > [1] - http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hubert, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Oh, yes - Mark is right about that. >> >> >> >> >> >> > 8282 is fine as far as I know. >> >> >> > 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?) >> >> >> > >> >> >> > HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be better >> >> choices. >> >> >> Or >> >> >> > others. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Ruwan Linton >> >> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform" >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Paul Fremantle >> >> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2 >> >> Apache Synapse PMC Chair >> >> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair >> >> >> >> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Ruwan Linton >> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform" >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Ruwan Linton >> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform" >> >
