Hi Mark, I think 8280 sounds good too. I am OK with 8280 as http and 8243 as https :-)
What do others think about this? and also is there any one out there who knows the port 8280 being widely used in any product as there default port? Thanks, Ruwan On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Mark Carranza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >43 suffix > Good idea, How about 80 suffix?: > HTTP 8280 > HTTPS 8243 > > --Mark > > (I'm buried (Founder: 1st startup, 1st month)) If someone knows OpenSSL > and > it's default ports well enough (not me, but I have seen 4443 used often > enough), please add them, with references, to the > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers page. > Thanks! > > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Ruwan Linton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Ooopppseee, I just realized that I missed the dev list from my original > > reply, > > > > Cc:ing dev list > > > > Thanks, > > Ruwan > > > > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Ruwan Linton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Paul, but 4433 is not listed even there. > > > > > > Anyway I checked 8243 there and it seems OK. > > > > > > Mark/Eric and all, what do you think about 8243 as the https port. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ruwan > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Ruwan > > >> > > >> This page is useful because it shows common usage as well as official > > >> assignment: > > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers > > >> > > >> Eric - based on the usual Apache rules we actually encourage you to > > >> vote. Ok I know this sounds wierd, but seriously the way that Apache > > >> works is that it encourages everyone in the community to vote, but for > > >> certain decisions only committers or PMC members are legally "binding > > >> votes" according to Apache rules. But, of course, the voting still is > > >> important information. Usually Apache votes don't end up in a "count" > > >> because we work towards consensus, so for most situations, we take all > > >> the input of the community, binding or not. > > >> > > >> Paul > > >> > > >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Ruwan Linton <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > Hhhmmm.... :-( > > >> > > > >> > I just checked the IANA [1] registered ports and found that 4433 is > > not > > >> > registered. > > >> > > > >> > Anyway I think openssl is widely used and we should change it, how > > about > > >> > 8243 (I don't like consecutive ports to be used as http and https) > > ports > > >> end > > >> > with 43 gives you some meaning of https because 443 is the default > > https > > >> > port :-) > > >> > > > >> > WDYT? > > >> > > > >> > [1] - http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers > > >> > > > >> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hubert, Eric < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> Oh, yes - Mark is right about that. > > >> >> > > >> >> > 8282 is fine as far as I know. > > >> >> > 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?) > > >> >> > > > >> >> > HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be better > > >> choices. > > >> >> Or > > >> >> > others. > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Ruwan Linton > > >> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform" > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Paul Fremantle > > >> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2 > > >> Apache Synapse PMC Chair > > >> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair > > >> > > >> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Ruwan Linton > > > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform" > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ruwan Linton > > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform" > > > -- Ruwan Linton http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
