Hi all,

These two ports seem to fit the most for synapse and I have created a JIRA
to change these ports for the 1.2 release.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNAPSE-326

Thanks,
Ruwan

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Andreas Veithen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> +1 for 8280 and 8243
>
> Andreas
>
> On 23 May 2008, at 16:45, Ruwan Linton wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I think 8280 sounds good too. I am OK with 8280 as http and 8243 as https
> :-)
>
> What do others think about this? and also is there any one out there who
> knows the port 8280 being widely used in any product as there default port?
>
> Thanks,
> Ruwan
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Mark Carranza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> >43 suffix
>> Good idea,  How about 80 suffix?:
>> HTTP 8280
>> HTTPS 8243
>>
>> --Mark
>>
>> (I'm buried (Founder: 1st startup, 1st month))  If someone knows OpenSSL
>> and
>> it's default ports well enough (not me, but I have seen 4443 used often
>> enough),  please add them, with references, to the
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers page.
>>  Thanks!
>>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Ruwan Linton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Ooopppseee, I just realized that I missed the dev list from my original
>> > reply,
>> >
>> > Cc:ing dev list
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Ruwan
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Ruwan Linton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks Paul, but 4433 is not listed even there.
>> > >
>> > > Anyway I checked 8243 there and it seems OK.
>> > >
>> > > Mark/Eric and all, what do you think about 8243 as the https port.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Ruwan
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Ruwan
>> > >>
>> > >> This page is useful because it shows common usage as well as official
>> > >> assignment:
>> > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
>> > >>
>> > >> Eric - based on the usual Apache rules we actually encourage you to
>> > >> vote. Ok I know this sounds wierd, but seriously the way that Apache
>> > >> works is that it encourages everyone in the community to vote, but
>> for
>> > >> certain decisions only committers or PMC members are legally "binding
>> > >> votes" according to Apache rules. But, of course, the voting still is
>> > >> important information. Usually Apache votes don't end up in a "count"
>> > >> because we work towards consensus, so for most situations, we take
>> all
>> > >> the input of the community, binding or not.
>> > >>
>> > >> Paul
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Ruwan Linton <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > Hhhmmm.... :-(
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I just checked the IANA [1] registered ports and found that 4433 is
>> > not
>> > >> > registered.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Anyway I think openssl is widely used and we should change it, how
>> > about
>> > >> > 8243 (I don't like consecutive ports to be used as http and https)
>> > ports
>> > >> end
>> > >> > with 43 gives you some meaning of https because 443 is the default
>> > https
>> > >> > port :-)
>> > >> >
>> > >> > WDYT?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > [1] - http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hubert, Eric <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> Oh, yes - Mark is right about that.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> > 8282 is fine as far as I know.
>> > >> >> > 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?)
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be better
>> > >> choices.
>> > >> >> Or
>> > >> >> > others.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > --
>> > >> > Ruwan Linton
>> > >> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Paul Fremantle
>> > >> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
>> > >> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
>> > >> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>> > >>
>> > >> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
>> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >>
>> > >> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Ruwan Linton
>> > > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ruwan Linton
>> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ruwan Linton
> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>
>
>


-- 
Ruwan Linton
http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"

Reply via email to