I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the features of 3 and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here since I have no training in design and the multitude of considerations involved such as scalability.
I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of the ASF ( http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics), although I don't know how strict this is. Deron On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboe...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to remove the > TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with no intentions > to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it too but it's > probably a different context, especially since there are discussions to add > SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-) > > Regards, > Matthias > > > On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote: > >> +1 for 1 >> >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson < >> jer...@objectadjective.com> >> wrote: >> >> +1 on option 1 as well. >>> >>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo with name and >>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with the other 3, >>> at >>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and isometric >>> versions. >>> They make a great family. >>> >>> ........................... >>> >>> Jeremy Anderson >>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective >>> >>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <frre...@us.ibm.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself. >>>> >>>> Fred >>>> >>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 >>>> 11:19:01 >>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1 because]Renee >>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank you so much! >>>> >>> +1 >>> >>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun! >>>> >>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <renee.uxdes...@gmail.com> >>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org >>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> love these!!! thank you so much! >>>> >>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun! >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <rosypeng...@gmail.com> >>>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png >>>>> google drive: >>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/ >>>>> view?usp=sharing >>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/ >>>>> view?usp=sharing> >>>>> >>>>> Hopefully one of these work. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Rose >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <fschue...@posteo.de> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Rose, >>>>>> >>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of size >>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the link? >>>>>> >>>>>> Felix >>>>>> >>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would love >>>>>>> >>>>>> to >>>> >>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that >>>>>>> >>>>>> conveys >>>>> >>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired >>>>>>> >>>>>> by a >>> >>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of >>>>>>> >>>>>> SystemML. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo explorations. >>>>>>> >>>>>> One >>>> >>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric >>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how they >>>>>>> >>>>>> would >>> >>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to >>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML >>>>>>> >>>>>> provides, >>> >>>> so >>>>> >>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several >>>>>>> >>>>>> variations. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd love >>>>>>> >>>>>> to >>> >>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other >>>>>>> >>>>>> suggestions >>>>> >>>>>> that we can take into consideration. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------- >>>>>>> *Rose Peng* >>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology >>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> ---------------------------------------- >>>>> *Rose Peng* >>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology >>>>> (www.rosepeng.com) >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>
