ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I wasn't
expecting this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
Regards,
Matthias
On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the features of 3
and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here since I have
no training in design and the multitude of considerations involved such as
scalability.
I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of the ASF (
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics), although I
don't know how strict this is.
Deron
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboe...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to remove the
TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with no intentions
to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it too but it's
probably a different context, especially since there are discussions to add
SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
Regards,
Matthias
On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
+1 for 1
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson <
jer...@objectadjective.com>
wrote:
+1 on option 1 as well.
For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo with name and
mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with the other 3,
at
small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and isometric
versions.
They make a great family.
...........................
Jeremy Anderson
https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <frre...@us.ibm.com>
wrote:
These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
Fred
[image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas ---10/21/2016
11:19:01
AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1 because]Renee
Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank you so much!
+1
on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
From: Renee Mascarinas <renee.uxdes...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
------------------------------
love these!!! thank you so much!
+1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <rosypeng...@gmail.com>
wrote:
imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
google drive:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
view?usp=sharing
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
view?usp=sharing>
Hopefully one of these work.
Thanks,
Rose
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <fschue...@posteo.de>
wrote:
Hi Rose,
I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of size
limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the link?
Felix
On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
Hi everyone,
The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would love
to
see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that
conveys
optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired
by a
matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of
SystemML.
In the attached image, we have two main types of logo explorations.
One
is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how they
would
look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to
communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML
provides,
so
whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several
variations.
Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd love
to
hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
suggestions
that we can take into consideration.
Thanks!
----------------------------------------
*Rose Peng*
MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
(www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
--
----------------------------------------
*Rose Peng*
MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
(www.rosepeng.com)
