Our suggestion is to use both. Logo 1 is the simplified version of the
robot. Logo 4 is the personification of the logo used to explain
concepts.
Sounds great!
Am 25.10.2016 19:36 schrieb Jason Azares:
Hey guys,
Branding wise, we also feel that #1 and #4 are the best choices. It's
great
that we're all on the same page. To answer the question of pros and
cons of
each logo, here is a quick list:
Logo 1:
- More versatile because of its scalability; We think logo 4 will be
hard to discern once sized down; Logo 1 looks cleaner in website
headers
with text
- Relevant because it has a matrix bracket
- It's a simplified version of the robot. Think of it as the
batman
signal and the robot is batman.
Logo 4:
- More original because it has a personality
- Diverse in the actions it can perform because it can move,
animate,
and be customized based on intent and use
- The robot is kind of cute and approachable
Our suggestion is to use both. Logo 1 is the simplified version of the
robot. Logo 4 is the personification of the logo used to explain
concepts.
We'd love to hear your thoughts!
Regards,
Jason and the design team
P.S. In general, here are our guidelines for creating a great logo:
- *original* - something that stands out from competitors
- *relevant* - reflects the brand's mission and values
- *versatile* - look good in black and white, in different colors
and
sizes depending on context (e.g. billboards, websites, t-shirts,
toys,
business cards, etc)
- *memorable* - easily recognizable everywhere (e.g. mickey mouse,
nike)
- *timeless* - not just based on what's currently popular
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, <dusenberr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Looks like there is a large amount of support for both #1 and #4.
Design
team, could you provide some more thoughts on the pros and cons for
each,
and perhaps any thoughts on ways the icons could be used in various
project
materials?
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
> On Oct 25, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> I like #4 as well.
> +1 on #4.
>
> -Arvind
>
> From: Berthold Reinwald <reinw...@us.ibm.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>
> +1 on #4.
>
> Regards,
> Berthold Reinwald
> IBM Almaden Research Center
> office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
> e-mail: reinw...@us.ibm.com
>
>
>
> From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 10/21/2016 04:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss <frre...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>
>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
>>
>>
> I like option $4 myself as well.
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
>
