I agree! +1 to using both. I think, like you suggested, that using #1 for headers and #4 for other uses sounds fantastic.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Jason Azares <jason.aza...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey guys, > > Branding wise, we also feel that #1 and #4 are the best choices. It's great > that we're all on the same page. To answer the question of pros and cons of > each logo, here is a quick list: > > Logo 1: > > > - More versatile because of its scalability; We think logo 4 will be > hard to discern once sized down; Logo 1 looks cleaner in website > headers > with text > - Relevant because it has a matrix bracket > - It's a simplified version of the robot. Think of it as the batman > signal and the robot is batman. > > Logo 4: > > > - More original because it has a personality > - Diverse in the actions it can perform because it can move, animate, > and be customized based on intent and use > - The robot is kind of cute and approachable > > Our suggestion is to use both. Logo 1 is the simplified version of the > robot. Logo 4 is the personification of the logo used to explain concepts. > > We'd love to hear your thoughts! > > Regards, > Jason and the design team > > P.S. In general, here are our guidelines for creating a great logo: > > - *original* - something that stands out from competitors > - *relevant* - reflects the brand's mission and values > - *versatile* - look good in black and white, in different colors and > sizes depending on context (e.g. billboards, websites, t-shirts, toys, > business cards, etc) > - *memorable* - easily recognizable everywhere (e.g. mickey mouse, nike) > - *timeless* - not just based on what's currently popular > > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, <dusenberr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Looks like there is a large amount of support for both #1 and #4. Design > > team, could you provide some more thoughts on the pros and cons for each, > > and perhaps any thoughts on ways the icons could be used in various > project > > materials? > > > > -- > > > > Mike Dusenberry > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > > > > On Oct 25, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: > > > > > > I like #4 as well. > > > +1 on #4. > > > > > > -Arvind > > > > > > From: Berthold Reinwald <reinw...@us.ibm.com> > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:34 AM > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas > > > > > > +1 on #4. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Berthold Reinwald > > > IBM Almaden Research Center > > > office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208 > > > e-mail: reinw...@us.ibm.com > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > > Date: 10/21/2016 04:37 PM > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss < > frre...@us.ibm.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself. > > >> > > >> > > > I like option $4 myself as well. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Luciano Resende > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- *Madison J. Myers* *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17* *King's College London, MA Political Science '14* *New York University, BA Political Science '12* - LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
