+1 that sounds great to me. --
Mike Dusenberry GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry Sent from my iPhone. > On Oct 25, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Madison Myers <madisonjmy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I agree! > +1 to using both. I think, like you suggested, that using #1 for headers > and #4 for other uses sounds fantastic. > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Jason Azares <jason.aza...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> >> Branding wise, we also feel that #1 and #4 are the best choices. It's great >> that we're all on the same page. To answer the question of pros and cons of >> each logo, here is a quick list: >> >> Logo 1: >> >> >> - More versatile because of its scalability; We think logo 4 will be >> hard to discern once sized down; Logo 1 looks cleaner in website >> headers >> with text >> - Relevant because it has a matrix bracket >> - It's a simplified version of the robot. Think of it as the batman >> signal and the robot is batman. >> >> Logo 4: >> >> >> - More original because it has a personality >> - Diverse in the actions it can perform because it can move, animate, >> and be customized based on intent and use >> - The robot is kind of cute and approachable >> >> Our suggestion is to use both. Logo 1 is the simplified version of the >> robot. Logo 4 is the personification of the logo used to explain concepts. >> >> We'd love to hear your thoughts! >> >> Regards, >> Jason and the design team >> >> P.S. In general, here are our guidelines for creating a great logo: >> >> - *original* - something that stands out from competitors >> - *relevant* - reflects the brand's mission and values >> - *versatile* - look good in black and white, in different colors and >> sizes depending on context (e.g. billboards, websites, t-shirts, toys, >> business cards, etc) >> - *memorable* - easily recognizable everywhere (e.g. mickey mouse, nike) >> - *timeless* - not just based on what's currently popular >> >> >> >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, <dusenberr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Looks like there is a large amount of support for both #1 and #4. Design >>> team, could you provide some more thoughts on the pros and cons for each, >>> and perhaps any thoughts on ways the icons could be used in various >> project >>> materials? >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Mike Dusenberry >>> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw >>> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone. >>> >>> >>>> On Oct 25, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: >>>> >>>> I like #4 as well. >>>> +1 on #4. >>>> >>>> -Arvind >>>> >>>> From: Berthold Reinwald <reinw...@us.ibm.com> >>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org >>>> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:34 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas >>>> >>>> +1 on #4. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Berthold Reinwald >>>> IBM Almaden Research Center >>>> office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208 >>>> e-mail: reinw...@us.ibm.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> >>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org >>>> Date: 10/21/2016 04:37 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss < >> frre...@us.ibm.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I like option $4 myself as well. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Luciano Resende >>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > > -- > *Madison J. Myers* > *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17* > > *King's College London, MA Political Science '14* > *New York University, BA Political Science '12* > > - > LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
