+1. Having the returned value is indeed an overkill for PropertySources. LieGrue, strub
> On Tuesday, 6 January 2015, 19:56, Anatole Tresch <[email protected]> wrote: > > BTW from my exoerience in implementing and specially combining the > PropertySources within the ConfigurationContext, I would say SPI handling > would be easier, if we would not return optional for the sources. On > Configuration I like the idea much more, but on SPI side, I think Optional > is an overkill. > > WDYT? > > Best, > Anatole > > -- > *Anatole Tresch* > Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead > Glärnischweg 10 > CH - 8620 Wetzikon > > *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* > *Twitter: @atsticks* > *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/ > <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>* > > *Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79* >
