already did this in a branch where I play around with java7. looks really good already!
LieGrue, strub > On Tuesday, 6 January 2015, 22:46, Oliver B. Fischer > <[email protected]> wrote: > > For PropertySource it would be ok for me to remove Optional, but not for > Configuration. > > Am 06.01.15 um 19:53 schrieb Anatole Tresch: >> BTW from my exoerience in implementing and specially combining the >> PropertySources within the ConfigurationContext, I would say SPI handling >> would be easier, if we would not return optional for the sources. On >> Configuration I like the idea much more, but on SPI side, I think Optional >> is an overkill. >> >> WDYT? >> >> Best, >> Anatole >> > > -- > N Oliver B. Fischer > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > P +49 30 44793251 > M +49 178 7903538 > E [email protected] > S oliver.b.fischer > > J [email protected] > X http://xing.to/obf >
