+1 i’m not a fan of Optional lg reini
> Am 06.01.2015 um 20:22 schrieb Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>: > > +1 > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2015-01-06 20:19 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > >> +1. Having the returned value is indeed an overkill for PropertySources. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Tuesday, 6 January 2015, 19:56, Anatole Tresch <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> BTW from my exoerience in implementing and specially combining the >>> PropertySources within the ConfigurationContext, I would say SPI handling >>> would be easier, if we would not return optional for the sources. On >>> Configuration I like the idea much more, but on SPI side, I think >> Optional >>> is an overkill. >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> Best, >>> Anatole >>> >>> -- >>> *Anatole Tresch* >>> Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead >>> Glärnischweg 10 >>> CH - 8620 Wetzikon >>> >>> *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* >>> *Twitter: @atsticks* >>> *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/ >>> <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>* >>> >>> *Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79* >>> >>
